To design a turbine-based combined cycle (TBCC) propulsion system for a proposed hypersonic executive transport inspired by Hermeus and the Lockheed SR-72 concepts. The system transitions from an afterburning gas turbine (up to Mach 2.5) to a ramjet (Mach 5 cruise at 24.5 km altitude). The design aimed to minimize total mass ratio while balancing thrust, fuel efficiency, and system-level constraints across all mission phases. This team project was completed as part of MAE 4321: Aerospace Propulsion.
Project Type: Team
Team Member: Raymond Fisk
Duration: ~4 weeks
Tools: Mattingly’s PARA & PERF (design/off-design cycle analysis), Inlet Flow Calculator (shock/diffuser modeling), Excel (sizing and mass budgeting)
Focus: TBCC Sizing, Cycle Analysis, Off-Design Performance
Outcome: Designed a dual-mode propulsion system with Mach 5 cruise capability and reduced fuel mass through staged TBCC integration.
Specific Thrust (N/(kg/s) as a Function of TT4 (K)
Designed a takeoff-to-cruise propulsion system using an afterburning turbojet (M = 0.2–2.5) and a ramjet (M = 2.5–5.0)
Performed parametric cycle analysis using PARA (TT4, πc, α) to select turbojet design conditions
Simulated ramjet inlet/diffuser recovery with 2D mixed-compression oblique shock ramp modeling
Used JP-7 fuel modeling and stage-by-stage component analysis with γ and enthalpy constraints
Calculated SFC, specific thrust, impulse, efficiency, and fuel mass fractions across the full mission
Sized nozzle geometries, ramp angles, and burner flow properties for both propulsion modes
Gas Turbine: Turbojet with afterburner selected via cycle parametrics (πc = 16, TT4 = 1800 K)
Ramjet: Oblique shock inlet with multi-ramp configuration, diffuser and burner optimized for M=5
Mission Profile: M=0.2 takeoff, M=2.5 transition, M=5 cruise over 7500 km
Propulsion Transition: Mode handover modeled at Mach 2.5 using mass flow continuity and pressure matching constraints
Key Analyses: Nozzle throat area sizing, burner Mach number, mass flow rate matching
Fuel Type: JP-7 for high-temp capability; enthalpy of reaction = 43,500 kJ/kg
Efficiencies: Gas turbine η₀ ≈ 0.45; Ramjet η₀ ≈ 0.587 (trajectory-averaged): Calculated using trajectory integration of PERF and inlet recovery data
Used PARA for engine configuration selection and design point thrust performance
Used PERF for off-design gas turbine analysis across Mach 0.2–2.5
Applied 2D inlet flow analysis to optimize ramp geometry and delay shock unstarts
Evaluated trajectory-averaged efficiency and calculated fuel and empty mass fractions
Used Breguet range equations to determine takeoff thrust and vehicle sizing from fuel mass data
Validated sizing using textbook Breguet range relations; matched vehicle mass and thrust to design constraints
Takeoff mass and thrust were iterated using fuel and empty mass fractions until convergence with the empirical correlation equation
Thrust Available (N) vs Mach Number
Specific Fuel Consumption ((kg/s)/kN) vs Mach Number
Specific Impulse (s) vs Mach Number
Overall Efficiency vs Mach Number
Sizing Summary & Fuel Mass Fraction Breakdown (derived from Breguet range estimation)
Mission/Altitude Specs
Cruise Mach Number, M: 5.0
Cruise Altitude: 24.5 km
Turbine Parameters
Gas Turbine Max Tt4: 1800 K
Ramjet Burner Exit Mach: 0.208
Inlet Recovery (πD at M = 5): 0.536
Output & Performance
Thrust Available at Transition (M = 2.5): 63,442 N
Total Payload: 3,400 kg
Total Fuel Mass Fraction: ~0.49
Specific Impulse (Gas Turbine Max): 2,507 s (~25.6 km/s effective exhaust velocity)
Trajectory-Averaged Ramjet Efficiency: 0.587
Achieving smooth performance transition between gas turbine and ramjet propulsion modes
Managing shock control and maintaining flow recovery across 2D inlet ramp geometries
Ensuring mass flow continuity and pressure matching at the transition Mach number (M = 2.5)
Iteratively adjusting burner entry Mach numbers, diffuser area ratios, and ramp angles to optimize thrust and efficiency
Balancing design feasibility with performance metrics (e.g., nozzle sizing, throat matching, drag coefficients)
These constraints required multiple looped iterations between ramp geometry, diffuser efficiency, and nozzle area matching to meet all mission objectives.
This project was completed in a 2-person team. I contributed to:
Gas turbine cycle configuration and off-design performance
Engine transition sizing and trajectory-averaged analysis
System-level mass budgeting and final report development
We delivered a trajectory-consistent TBCC propulsion solution achieving Mach 5 cruise and improved cruise efficiency through integrated multi-mode staging. Final configuration demonstrated effective performance handover between propulsion modes and compliance with system mass and range constraints.
Propulsion System Design · Turbine-Based Combined Cycle (TBCC) · Para & Perf Engine Modeling · Ramjet Inlet Optimization · Mass Fraction Analysis · Excel · Thermodynamic Trade Studies · Cycle Parametrics · Inlet Flow Simulation · Report Development
This project gave me first-hand experience with propulsion system integration across flight regimes. Working with Mattingly’s PARA and PERF tools, with hand-derived inlet and nozzle analyses, strengthened my ability to bridge theoretical models with real-world engine performance simulations. I gained deeper insight into staging transitions, flow recovery behavior, and how vehicle mass and sizing constraints drive tradeoffs in thrust, efficiency, and fuel usage.
This experience established my interest in high-speed propulsion systems and built confidence in applying design tools and workflows used in both aerospace research and industry.
*Note: Key plots, parameter tables, and design documentation are presented below. Detailed Excel spreadsheets are available upon request*
Download Project PDF
View or Download Project Report (PDF)